Why not inject some CSS into it the pages with !important tagged onto the rules you need?

See GM_addStyle or if you choose to inject it into the page a style tag.

Minification is user initiated... you may choose to mention that something won't work... however it would be better to say why, which ones, and how much rather than just saying it doesn't on "some". As Doctors sometimes say when a patient says "It hurts when I do this."... "Then don't do it.". ES6 support should be sometime in the next few days... so what you are claiming by your general statement is that ES5 isn't minifying correctly... perhaps you could contribute to the community as a whole and figure out why... and of course let us know too. :)

I've tested a subset of the scripts here and they appear to be doing well including my own active ones... I will attempt to make some minor modifications to the defaults when and if necessary but UglifyJS2 is responsible for the forked minification on user initiated installation.

Re: @mihaimorcov:

It is "very cool" and keeps the "copyright cults" at bay, as I just read on another site, from being snarky about it.

I've already examined your account and unless you notify moderation with flagging I don't see any issue with your scripts being improperly forked... but doesn't mean the name hasn't changed... hence why you should report it if it's missing the fork history.

There's only one solution in this case

I've given you several options... what you plan to do is your choice. If you are planning on gaining a bad attitude about it then there may be only one solution for you. The TOS is available before anyone logs in and accepts it by doing that.

thank you.

You are welcome.

Re: @mihaimorcov:

but what fork does ?

Visit someone elses Source Code tab and you will see it

It updates the code on my initial script page ?

That is a different feature with the OpenUserJS metadata block.. visit https://openuserjs.org/user/add/scripts#collaboration

in the case where someone would copy paste the code from my page, and would post a new script from their account, but with my base code. Am I able to report that page...

Yes... but...

... to be removed ?

No. All scripts may be forked period. You may report it and it will be evaluated and fixed with the fork history if applicable. Most of the ask.fm scripts here on this site for example all stem from one script but they can be forked all they want to be. This is no different than GitHub's forking capabilities.

OUJS encourages teamwork with optional and preferred collaboration but for example if you disappear for an extended amount of time FOSS licensing will allow derivatives and even if you don't disappear someone may want something different that you don't like... thus forking is always allowed.

We do encourage everyone to create a script issue first and if there isn't a response then fork it! :)

Re: @mihaimorcov:

Short question, if someone copies my script from this site, and lets say he only does very few changes, as putting his own name, but abusively using my work, can I report him and have his copy removed ?

If that user didn't fork it with the "Submit Code as Fork" I will fix the fork status to give you upstream status providing you were first in the queue. All scripts may be forked with the sites forking capabilities. Even one of my active ones was forked properly with zero changes and that's currently okay... We may end up preventing that code wise at a later date but if it's a one character change and it has the fork history in it properly it's fine.

Someone may not remove anothers @copyright but may add their own as well.

but abusively using my work

How is it being abused other than annoyance?

Greasemonkey Port 3.6.0.1rc2pre.xpi (SeaMonkey only) is available now at the SF file repo.

This addresses the drag-and-drop even install skipping which is backed-out from GM upstream work-around that was also starting to show with direct installs here on OUJS. Thanks to janekptacijarabaci for contributing.

Re: @Funscript:

I followed the link...

Apparently you didn't read far enough. :)

To summarize... You can't delete your account here.

1. I can ban you permanently and forever with a valid reason however the current administration policy is to leave the account on our system intact without that reason.

2. However... if you are still concerned you may access https://myaccount.google.com/intro/security#connectedapps with your current OAuth and remove the OpenUserJS authentication. This has a similar effect of me banning you however if you ever, for any reason, decide to come back you may need Admin or better intervention and we will need additional verification that we currently don't have. Me banning is currently permanent on this site and may reflect negatively on your Google account at some point... You removing the OAuth key is not necessarily a permanent situation on this site and has no negative connotation with your Google account.

3. Learn not to leave your OAuth (Google in this case) signed in constantly to avoid mishaps that you are solely responsible for.

Think carefully before you decide and I hope some of this helps.

OUJS Admin

Re: @Funscript:

#359

/* THIS SCRIPT IS PROTECTED - IF YOU WANT TO CHANGE CODE OR PARTS OF CODE CONTACT THE AUTHOR OF THIS
SCRIPT. ANY OTHER CHANGE IN SCRIPT IS NOT LEGAL */

This isn't allowed... all scripts may be forked with modifications, etc. Please reread the Terms of Service link at the bottom of the page.

Thanks,
OUJS Admin

Please elaborate why you would to do this. "Renews" is one of the vague parts.

Re: @VixieB:

I click on install it just takes me to a page of code.

Please read this section of How do I get going?... and choose your browser on how to install Userscripts

Re: @BanHammer:

how open issue? admins!

Only the owner of a script can reopen an issue... I assume that you closed this so I've reopened it but this is a one time thing... so only test on your own scripts please.

@ShiroTora,
Your discussion was moved here since this is where questions on a particular script should be. In the future please open up an issue on the script itself.

TIA,
OUJS Admin

Re: @Artex:

Chrome didn't support destructuring ...

Destructuring assignment should eventually be supported. ES6 was just finalized ~5 months ago and Google is a bit slow to adopt. Glad you found what you needed.

Re: @trespassersW:

Looks like his current SCM repository is at https://github.com/codebox/table-sorter and it's active as of ~11 days ago. Nice find @trespassersW !

Re: @parola:

This is an official answer to my question...

Must have missed that question here on OUJS. ;)

It would mean a world to me to get this portfolio with a single click.

That would be highly unlikely if they don't offer a download of your portfolio.

However on one image that I pulled up the thumbnail is:

• https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/236x/6e/e3/4e/6ee34e6a4b6b302056d7d369bc7adda8.jpg

... and it's corresponding high-res image seems to be:

• https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/originals/6e/e3/4e/6ee34e6a4b6b302056d7d369bc7adda8.jpg

So if you querySelectorAll the img tags you could change those nodes src attributes to the high-res image with a replace in the path you might be able to reduce your clicks with a right click save them to a folder on your new storage medium.

Kind of an annoying site always asking me to sign up too. Anyhow that appears to be the methodology for anyone willing to write and publish the script for you... however I would suggest learning at least a little bit about Userscripts at the same time so you can begin to become self sufficient and proficient with Userscripts. :)

Greasemonkey Port 3.6.0.1rc1pre-sm.xpi is available now at the SF file repo.

Re: @murko69:

Check out querySelector at MDN. You will find it to have familiar CSS selector syntax.

1. Find the element you are looking for with querySelector
2. See if it is just a plain href... if so modify it
3. If it's a JavaScript event listener then it will become a little more complicated as you may need to use preventDefault in a click listener.

MDN has some good examples to get you started. :)

You seem to currently have the paths missing on every one of your scripts too.

May want to fix those...

Current errored @require:

// @require      mbz-loujine-sidebar.js
// @require      mbz-loujine-common.js

Able to reply...

Should be indexed as 1

*ping*

Re: @Marti:
Working now.

This is a test.