Re: @trespassersW:

As for now, is there any sense in writing meta-tags @downloadURL, @updateURL and their ilk?

Absolutely... consolidation is the main factor. The minification routines are exposing these flat out in the UI now and how it interacts with a script source. Being cautious of a target is good however that doesn't negate effective, uncrippled, usage... which leads to the paranoia aspect... don't install it if you don't trust it.

Network of Trust is something I've been mentioning off and on for over a decade now with Userscripts.

                        "GbAfE4cD87y0AHQjP82Qwos1dxRiQCIlbowFxuIpRAKFqJr2m8HVXM" +
                        "QcwdlsZtLu7+mLveax6EIRm30r

... should be...

                        "GbAfE4cD87y0AHQjP82Qwos1dxRiQCIlbowFxuIpRAKFqJr2m8HVXM" +
                        "QcwdlsZtLu7+mLveax6EIRm30r"

        var $elEditor = $('#ace-editor'),
        var $elTabs = $('.ui-tabs');

... should be...

        var $elEditor = $('#ace-editor');
        var $elTabs = $('.ui-tabs');

At the end of the file you are missing a }.

  for (var i=0;i<FORMAT_ORDER.length;i++) {
    var format=FORMAT_ORDER[i];

... should be:

  for (var i=0;i<FORMAT_ORDER.length;i++) {
    var format=FORMAT_ORDER[i];
  }

if (ga) { / check if sale is

... should be // check if sale is

Re: @-BioHaZard-:

This script appears to host the CSS elsewhere which has:

#searchform {
    position: fixed!important;
    z-index: 103;
}

... with no mention of #gb { in the CSS anymore... so Admin closing.

Ref:

• tumpio/gmscripts#4

Admin closed since the author responded and did re-import... when this author gets around to another update it will confirm if the GH webhook is properly configured over there... if it is ever out of sync please open a new issue and let us know.

All down votes here have been reset... try out the newer, non-version bumped, version please.

The Author has been notified... if there isn't a response in a few days I'll resync it manually. There's no guarantee that the webhook is enabled though on GH unless this author states that it is... that is out of my control. This is why it's good to make sure sources match to prevent misunderstandings. I always do double checks just to be on the overly cautious side myself. We had one point over on nodejitsu where things really got messed up from them and that's one of the reasons why we aren't there any more. :)

OUJS Admin

Re: @Marti:

Removed the secret on GH and again still working

Ref:

• 7fb10e5#diff-3288378
• Updated date of Mon Mar 14 2016 19:04:09 GMT+0000 (UCT) on RFC 2606§3 - Hello, World!.
• 
• 

Re: @Marti:

So I added a "secret" to my webhook and it's still working for me. Did not need to reimport to reestablish the existing sync hook.

Ref:

• 59e84fe#diff-3288378
• Updated date of Mon Mar 14 2016 18:57:13 GMT+0000 (UCT) on RFC 2606§3 - Hello, World!.

Re: @quacku:

... is it possible for the author to later update it and have @include http://siteB.com?

Yes.

... isn't this a security risk... ?

See also:

• Userscript Beginners HOWTO#What are the risks?
• Greasemonkey Manual: Managing Scripts (little dated but informational none-the-less) ... in particular #Enabling e.g. User choices are always available outside of Author choices.

Sidenote: Please try your best to use back ticks (the back apostrophes surrounding your inline code) for inline code snippets and/or code fences for multi-line with highlighting (see Frequently Asked Questions#Q: How do I ensure the correct syntax highlighting of my code snippets?). I've corrected it in your last post.

If you need a guide for markdown syntax there is GitHubs (GH) and one of the originals of Daring Fireballs markdown syntax... plus there is always the toolbar in this comment window to help you out... the </> button is the symbol to assist helping you get used to it. The Preview button is everyone's friend too. :) We support many of those options in our markdown support... but not every one of GH's. Thank you for this courtesy in advance. :)

Re: @quacku:

Welcome. :)

Re: @quacku:

Can you EDIT the script in the openuserjs inline editor and increment the version?

Yes.

... or will this lock the script from updating like @jerone mentioned?

Jerone's statement is if you edit the script locally on your machine in the gm_scripts folder either directly or through the .user.js engine UI. Greasemonkey (GM) 3.7+ has a visual display now on what can and can't be updated automatically (see greasemonkey/greasemonkey#2358)... still twiddling with this testing wise.

For example if you open up the AOM and right click one of the User Scripts... edit it... and save it... then you lose automatic updating capabilities for that edited script... at least with GM/GM Port. e.g. not the OpenUserJS.org (OUJS) remote editor. GM 3.7+ also now prevents disabled scripts from updating. I haven't tried any of this with any other .user.js engine to see what happens on local edit.

So the answer to this half of your compound question is no.

do you have to re-upload the updated script with an incremented version?

This is one option. There is editing the script online, uploading a new version, or the webhook/import from GH... remotely... all of which you may increment your @version.

I still don't understand how this works.

Better?

Re: @diegokfu:

n/m it is... bye to this account.

Re: @diegokfu:

... but send gifts in CSGOCardGames is already desatived.

Are you saying this an undocumented auto-gifting here? If so this is flaggable for removal. I don't understand the word "desatived".

OUJS Admin

Re: @TimidScript:

Not quite sure why this was mirrored back then but I was able to delete the other discussion... so should just be one discussion now. :)

While it's a rather amusing license titling of DBAD this is definitely not on the OSI approved list.

Please see https://opensource.org/faq#public-domain.

Currently at Line 649 you have $('.report') .before('<a href="#" title="Lock message so it can't be deleted when multiple messages are sellected" class="fluid_blue_light_medium" id="eRS_Lock"><span>Lock Message</span></a>');... which should have can't as can\'t since the outer apostrophes near .before(' exist.

Thanks for the look.

function $(id) document.getElementById(id); ... this doesn't appear to be correct currently on line 14.

Thanks for the look.

Few error in this script.

Re: @ardiman:

Welcome. It should be trapped now.

Re: @ardiman:

Import is fine. node issue you tripped on with your Userscript... will trap this glitch next week... deleted... however if you reimport it as is it will trip it again. See your repo line comment.

Re: @jobevers:

Why do you have a secret set?

Re: @jobevers:

I created a new script: https://openuserjs.org/scripts/jobevers/Minimal_Udacity_Classroom and added a webhook to the related repo (https://github.com/jobevers/minimal-udacity-classroom).

• Webhook is usually first... but not always.
• Create script on GitHub second
• Import from GitHub on this page to enable using the webhook after you select it. (You can always redo this portion as many times as needed if you think there is a glitch... however...)

Ref:

• https://github.com/Martii/UserScripts/commit/52410b0c2a01a2db5cb57bb620232c97b99203e2 (Works for me)