Re: @cuzi:

ahh good point. ;) sup dude! :)

Re: @burn:

what do you mean by "use of superscript"?

I took it as a compliment to you. I think it meant that he "loves using your super script".

Oh, the right word isn't "steal", it's "inspire" :)

Indeed! ;)

Re: @TimidScript:

commercial usage?

Just for additional clarification to you MIT allows commercial usage of the Code not the Content.

Re: @TimidScript:

I thought "Creative Commons BY-NC-SA" was not allowed due to limitations on commercial usage?

*No derivative licenses are not allowed of any kind. CC is a Content license in which arbitration will force MIT as the Code license... therefore one can fork this users code. It's all in the TOS. :)

If you are willing to do this it would be very kewl.

Btw thanks for the screenshot... your next challenge, if you wish to take this on, is to do it for any account. :)

Re: @burn:

Does this Make sense?

The likelihood of using local storage is minimal from the OUJS perspective due to this. It would be very frustrating for those users that did clear it and reports would come in. Also some extensions/add-ons block local storage usage completely. I think it's best to keep this user.js side.

Re: @devnoname120:

I changed the license to Creative Commons BY-NC-SA.

That means you've selected MIT Code License which is okay in tandem with your Content License. :)

Re: @jerone:

see this build-in to the site

We could use client side local storage but will run into a security risk. I've thought many a time about doing something similar to US.o script author helper but usually it ends up needing the data stored client side... which runs into collisions with automatic cleanup routines on the client computer.

Re: @burn:

It would be nice to have a screenshot on your script homepage too. I've installed this a few times and didn't observe much happening... so it would be nice to know exactly where to look.

Re: @TimidScript:

That seems very odd that they are in sync like that.

Not in sync right now and not odd to me if they were. As per a potential bug report please do those on the GitHub Issue Tracker.

Please review the Terms of Service.

Thanks.

Re: @TimidScript:

Does the install counter include automatic updates?

It is the accumulation of all installs.

Re: @pootz:

Relook at your markdown code now and see how it is generated the way you want it with inlineImageSyntax space inlineImageSyntax space inlineImageSyntax and so on.

Would this be better as a Library? Just curious based off your @name.

Re: @pootz:

Probably the same issue as #221.

Re: @TimidScript:

http://opensource.org/faq#commercial. In your case I wouldsuggest GPL Code License and a Content License if images are present. GPL will force changes to be made available to you and everyone else. Anyone can sell a disc containing any open-source... however GPL must make the code freely available to everyone.

Re: @TimidScript:

Can I do a hello world script, it should be perfectly legitimate just 100% useless

See this script. Nobody visits IANA test domains other than for testing.

Re: @Marti:

Your license resembles MIT now with your comment... so @license MIT License; https://github.com/TimidScript/GreasyMonkey/blob/master/LICENSE.mdcould work.

Re: @TimidScript:

Is it ok now?

You must have the OSI approved license name in your source. You can't just link @license to a URL elsewhere.

Please read the TOS.

Re: @TimidScript:

Btw your invalid licensing in your recently removed test script is a violation of the TOS. If you do this a third time you might be eligible for removal yourself. :)

Re: @TimidScript:

Is it possible to import it as a library

If the extension is filename.js only and not filename.user.js.

Re: @jscher2000:

unfortunately, I also need to support IE8

You might find the ghack article at http://www.ghacks.net/2014/08/07/microsoft-to-only-support-most-recent-ie-version-from-2016-on/ useful.

Re: @cuzi:

If you are running the script within the Sandbox (e.g. @grant something other than none) then they are isolated scopes unless you use unsafeWindow with a page scope variable (implementation just changed on this btw). If you run @grant none you could use a page scope variable directly but risk detection again. Messaging can be detected by the host site too. So it's really up to you what you want to do and risk. I've used GMs storage to transfer data between windows/tabs before just to maintain non-detection.

You've already been given a chance to remedy this situation and are now eligible for removal. Goodbye.

I've gone ahead and done it for you. Please ensure that you do this procedure in the future otherwise your entire account may be eligible for removal.