Are you sure you want to go to an external site to donate a monetary value?
WARNING: Some countries laws may supersede the payment processors policy such as the GDPR and PayPal. While it is highly appreciated to donate, please check with your countries privacy and identity laws regarding privacy of information first. Use at your utmost discretion.
Thanks, I already have "Show hidden hit notices checked." What I'm trying to do is fully unhide all hidden hits temporarily.
Also, how difficult do you suppose it would be to make this script work on Google Shopping and DuckDuckGo Shopping? I imported some sites to my blocklist manually (e.g. "Amazon.com") but they're still coming through on shopping search results, so I guess those pages would need to be parsed differently than regular web search results...
To whoever maintains this script, first of all, thank you! Second, would it be possible to add a button for Quick Unhide All, i.e. unhiding hidden results for the current search session only?
Personally, when I look up how to do something, I want to read an article, not watch a video, so I have this script set to block youtube. However, if at some point I do want to search for a video, then I'd have to go to the Manager, disable the youtube entry from my blocklist, and reload the tab, then reverse the process when I'm done.
Instead, it would be great to have a button (or a toggle), either next to the Manager on the side of the window, or perhaps beside/within the search tools itself (you know, those tools at the top of a search page that have options for "disable safe mode" etc.). Clicking the button would unhide all hidden search results (or maybe only regular hidden results, while keeping permabanned results hidden!), but only until you close/reload/navigate away from the tab. (Bonus: It would be extra cool if the temporarily-unhidden state could be maintained while navigating to page 2, 3, etc. of results).
I hate coming onto forums and asking for free labor, but unfortunately I have nowhere near the JS experience required to even begin to tackle this myself.
Do you think this is a reasonable feature to implement?