Re: @TimidScript:

Is it ok now?

You must have the OSI approved license name in your source. You can't just link @license to a URL elsewhere.

Please read the TOS.

Re: @TimidScript:

Btw your invalid licensing in your recently removed test script is a violation of the TOS. If you do this a third time you might be eligible for removal yourself. :)

Re: @TimidScript:

Is it possible to import it as a library

If the extension is filename.js only and not filename.user.js.

Re: @jscher2000:

unfortunately, I also need to support IE8

You might find the ghack article at http://www.ghacks.net/2014/08/07/microsoft-to-only-support-most-recent-ie-version-from-2016-on/ useful.

Re: @cuzi:

If you are running the script within the Sandbox (e.g. @grant something other than none) then they are isolated scopes unless you use unsafeWindow with a page scope variable (implementation just changed on this btw). If you run @grant none you could use a page scope variable directly but risk detection again. Messaging can be detected by the host site too. So it's really up to you what you want to do and risk. I've used GMs storage to transfer data between windows/tabs before just to maintain non-detection.

You've already been given a chance to remedy this situation and are now eligible for removal. Goodbye.

I've gone ahead and done it for you. Please ensure that you do this procedure in the future otherwise your entire account may be eligible for removal.

This script appears to be a fork of this script.

Please go that script, click the Source Code page, and submit your version as a fork. You have less than 24 hours to do this before removal.

Thanks.

Re: @TimidScript:

Is there a way to get the actual number of people who voted

Should be visible now.

Re: @BitTorrentse:

You've been relisted... double check please.

Re: @trespassersW:

You've been relisted... double check please.

Re: @dluciv:

You've been relisted... double check please.

Re: @dluciv:

licensed CC:BY-NC-SA 4.0

That is fine to add to your next @license key if you wish... so long as it's not a no-derivative license. OUJS will show them all. If it's just a link to somewhere I wouldn't worry about it though... the license should be on their end. The OpenUserJS.org stands for keeping things open source even before I hopped in here. :)

Re: @trespassersW:

removes the script from groups which it belonged to?

When it's flagged over the threshold it unlists it... you'll need to wait until the fix is deployed for me to attempt to relist it. It's still there just unlisted to the general public. The fix needs review from OUJS members and deployed. I'm aiming for Thursday with any luck... this will depend on sizzle too.

Re: @jscher2000:

It's compatible as a module however the way you've done it isn't... usually those are done with pull requests on GitHub (GH). I'm still reading up on Affero GPL that might alleviate any perceived issue in the future. GM via Fx is technically a "server" I believe. Your script appears to be a good short term workaround... I'll try it out in a day or two. Thanks.

Re: @BitTorrentse:

all script not show

Got a fix ready... needs reviewing by other OUJS members... give me a couple days to wait for input and I'll do my best to get this deployed if there aren't any huge blocking issues with this bug. Thanks for your patience. :)

Re: @BitTorrentse:

Btw I'm trying to work on this with no luck so far. :(

Re: @BitTorrentse:

I know it's a bug with flagging that I'm working on but I've uncovered more than one. Please be patient and we'll get you relisted when these are fixed.

Re: @Marti:

... Application wise that is looking... we'll still look at all script source to find malware if it exists in everyones script.

Re: @jscher2000:

Temporary workaround:...

Current site code license is GPLv3+ so we'll never look at the source Jefferson since you've BSD'd it... anyone on OUJS can view what it does to the DOM though. :)

Re: @jscher2000:

add back this line

He did sometime yesterday... it's showing on the main page. :)

Re: @dluciv:

btw @copyright and @license have been around since at least 2005... so almost a decade... so it shouldn't break anything anywhere. Closing issue. Thanks. :)

Re: @dluciv:

And now you are confusing me by what you say versus what you did... you fixered it. :) :P

Re: @dluciv:

It is ok.

As it stands now you are still unlisted because of it. Eventually everything will be validated and your script will eventually be sent to the graveyard because of this. I recommend strongly at this to follow the guidelines I mentioned. It's not being parsed properly due to user error of the license key. I thought I'd work with you before I removed it... another Moderator or higher role can still remove you. Your choice.