Re: @srazzano:

Now that you have added it back in today you still have the bug with https://openuserjs.org/?orderBy=installs&orderDir=desc&limit=a. I clicked on sort by installs and this is the url generated. You might want to check all of the sort by's. Thanks.

Re: @Marti:

Just remember to leave the master license header intact and add your own modification block attributing you and/or your project.

Re: @doomred:

Is this what you mean...

Here is the current highlighted master license header at https://github.com/sizzlemctwizzle/GM_config/blob/master/gm_config.js#L1-L24 plus your header stating that you modified it afterwards... like you stated.

Once I fixed out an issue in gm_config

You might want to let us know upstream with a new issue ticket. I haven't been testing it since May when USO went down but it was working exactly how I was using it. :)

I looks impossible to linking mirrored library on different sites with only web hook set on github.

Fork it on GitHub and just reference your fork/branch in this user.js with the @require. There's no need to web hook it in for that usage. You can see my fork and my branches here. master branch is a mirror of upstream GM_config (GMC) and slave branch is around the last version of version 2ish. Sizzle uses commit hashes over major dot minor dot build versioning so that's why it's "2ish". You can create your own slave branch, or other name, on your own fork of GMC and modify to your hearts content.

Greasemonkey Port 2.2.0.1rc1pre-sm is available. The affected issue with GM_xmlhttpRequest tests okay here. Available on across-stream repo. Please note new minVersion is 2.29 for SeaMonkey.

Re: @doomred:

And now it's updated properly on the master... e.g. please use that header at minimum in your branch. Thanks. :)

Re: @doomred:

Not quite the solution I was thinking of putting it on a branch at https://raw.github.com/doomred/hacer/devvel/hacer.gm_config.js... this pretty much contradicts the concept of forking on GitHub... I'll have to run this by the team and see if they have any issues with it being done this way.

And our current header is this (which probably needs updating soon):

/*
Copyright 2009-2013, GM_config Contributors
All rights reserved.

GM_config Contributors:
    Mike Medley <medleymind@gmail.com>
    Joe Simmons
    Izzy Soft
    Marti Martz

GM_config is distributed under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public License.

    GM_config is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify
    it under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public License as published by
    the Free Software Foundation, either version 3 of the License, or
    (at your option) any later version.

    This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
    but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
    MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the
    GNU Lesser General Public License for more details.

    You should have received a copy of the GNU Lesser General Public License
    along with this program.  If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
*/

and your post header should be something along the lines of:

/*****************************
 * Description: Customized for hacer, just works & easy to use.
 * Edit & Optimize By:
 *             dye E. jarhoo(github.com/doomred),
 * Many Thanks To:
 *             zjworks,
\*******************************************************/

Re: @doomred:

It's one of those curiosities with LGPL and GPL... keeping things free forever. JavaScript Modules (jsm) like usage are about the only way to use them together with some of the more unusual OSI approved licenses like ISC (which I hadn't heard of until just a short while ago especially when I ran by your script and went "What's this?" ;)

Re: @srazzano:

;) Myes?

Re: @srazzano:

Here's another boog... using your settings panel if I type in undefined for scripts per page... this also reproduces the root issue. Also you have some QSP issues as the URL returned in some cases is this https://openuserjs.org/?orderBy=updated&orderDir=desc?limit=undefined... notice the multiple search question marks ?.

Re: @srazzano:

I can reproduce this with https://openuserjs.org/?limit=undefined. Returns exactly one page of results... not a good thing to do. I think a part of what he means is you don't have direct validation if typed in the address bar or hyperlinked like this somewhere else. If somehow the value is hosed then you are potentially causing a DDoS if too many ppl are using your script. So this definitely is a boog.

Re: @doomred:

Why not head over to the Issues tab of your script and we'll hash out some more suggestions there.

Re: @cuzi:

Although I think you can only do this once per script.

Creating a new group is only once per script however you can add it to several existing groups. Thanks for covering this question cuzi. :)

Re: @Marti:

Additionally you may however @require it either from the OUJS Raw Source here or the upstream master.

User scripts end in .user.js not .js. So for this script you would do a rename of your filename from whatever.js to whatever.user.js. Then you can correctly upload that to OpenUserJS.org.

User scripts end in .user.js not .js. So for this script you would do a rename of your filename from whatever.js to whatever.user.js. Then you can correctly upload that to OpenUserJS.org.

User scripts end in .user.js not .js. So for this script you would do a rename of your filename from whatever.js to whatever.user.js. Then you can correctly upload that to OpenUserJS.org.

You can't declare ISC and use GPL in the same source.

Please fix.

Re: @yermulnik:

Sorry about that... was trying to check if I could notify you on your upstream but you don't seem to have this upstream. Anyhow... you need to fix this or it will be eligible for removal.

Re: @cletusc:

@Marti, do you have any suggestions on how to handle this? Original scripts were CC-NC-SA.

Preferably needs to be "Submit Code as Fork" which should give you tracked attribution if you have posted here on OUJS. CC is a Content license in which MIT is the Code license so that is okay. If you posted your code here your original code would be dual licensed as MIT Code and CC Content since you didn't declare a Code license.

@srazzano does need to include the CC license though in the source.

User scripts are expressed in filename.user.js. Currently all of your scripts are claiming to be libraries. Please repost as a user script if that is your intention.

Default Licensing is MIT for this Library. If this isn't what you wanted please add a @license key or a license header. Thanks.

Re: @doomred:

May want to checkout https://openuserjs.org/about/Greasemonkey-for-Firefox#installing-userscripts

Re: @decembre:

Hey decembre can you be a little more specific please. Ideally this announcement isn't the right place but over at Development is. Thanks.

Re: @TimidScript:

He didn't know that.

Sure he did. ;) Besides this is a different site than there so he can keep it MIT like he is doing for this user.js. :)

Re: @srazzano:

Results are limited to 25 by site default and can not be changed.

This is a very interesting script although it would be helpful to know if there is a personal reason behind this. I'm still baffled. Yes results are tied to 25 entries. Since I don't really understand the reasoning of doing it table style perhaps you can enlighten everyone and we may make an exception to return more results... no promises though.